Accelerator Physics Group Meeting March 8, 2001 Present: J. Wei, Slava Danilov, Jeff Holmes, San ho Kim, Dong O Jeon, Paul Chu, Mark Doleans, Eugene Tanke, Sarah Cousinea, Weishi Wan, John Galambos Jie Wei noted that physics personel need to react carefully, and reach conclusions comphrehensively, and responsibly. Also publications author lists need to be inclusive, with credit given fully. Finally, it was noted that the DOE has not approved the idea of assume R&D success vis-a-vis higher cavity gradients (due to EP) for the baseline, due to the tight schedule. Danilov and Holmes presented benchmark results for the new impedance model in ORBIT. An analytically tractable model is used, and similar behavior is observed in the numerical results. A more exact beanchmark is underway. The model implies that halo may be generated from imedance enhanced beam oscillations. Holmes reported that he working point search is still underway. Cousineau reported good progress with Nuria Ctalan-Lasheas last week in incorporating collimation into ORBIT. Paul Chu noted that cdev communication with channel access has been demonstrated and that a swig interface to cdev has also been implemented. This means that sripting interfaces through cdev should be possible, with the native scripting languages such as Tcl, python and PERL. Dong O reported that matching of the MEBT and DTL looks promising using emittance measurements on the D-plate, even in the presence of expected errors. Weishi Wan reported that the survey team will be involved in the magnet measurement process and will record the magnetic center to fiducial information. We need to determine if the magnet measurement group uses the same centers as the survey group. Sang ho reviewed the temperature rise calculations in the wave guide chase. Water cooling will be added to the wave guides as a result of these calculations. Questions remain as to the impact on reference line impact from the ~ 20 degree temperature swings expected in the air temperature. Sasha reported on analysis of the BPM ability to detect the bunch length in the MEBT. Relative RMS bunch lengths should be fairly strightforward an independent of bunch shape. Absolute lengths require accurate knowledge of the bunch charge (i.e. current). Marc showed results of benchmarking SCL multi-particle tracking results and the impact of cavity misalignment. For expected cavity misalignments, with random distributions, there is little impact on the emittance.